RF365 |
|
Who’s the baddest of them all? (Part II)By Os Davis | Friday, June 06, 2008 | |
![]() |
| What's the buzz about? | Log In above and share your thoughts on this topic with other fans! |
| No.1 Patsfreak |
11:33 AM 06/06/2008 | |
| I think your math is off... You said; Decade of success. Pats Patriots 5, Raiders 3. Ownership. ...Meanwhile, this category’s a wash... Tie Patriots 5, Raiders 4. Should be Patriots 5, Raiders 3. Quarterback. Raiders. Patriots 5, Raiders 4 Fear factor. Raiders. Raiders 5, Patriots 5. Animated representation. Tie Raiders 5, Patriots 5. Final evidence offered as proof. Pats Patriots 6, Raiders 5 . Although I do not think of these Pats as on the dark side (must be because I am here with them, huh?) Why is it the 9ers of the 80's aren't in the mix? They were caught manipulating the salary cap and had great success making them hated by all non San Fran fans... | ||
| No.2 |
12:08 PM 06/06/2008 | |
| Patsfreak: * = 5 and counting. | ||
| No.3 xX_TRUE-RAIDER_Xx |
04:42 PM 06/06/2008 | |
| Funny PATS but the patriots will never compare as bad image team they just plainly cheat!!! | ||
Brady, Pats bond strong as e...
This is Time to celebrate for the global fans of New England Patriots... |
Bruschi Retirement Thoughts:...
Over the last decade the NFL has seen a lot of characters compete on i... |
New-look New England, old Ma...
Here’s a game New England Patriots season ticket holders have been awa... |
Just say yes to Pats-Colts
Let’s see, what don’t we have for the latest, most obscure chapter of... |
Penalty-gate!
Ah, it wouldn’t be football in the 2000s without accusations of cheati... |