NFL News      NCAA News      Help
Sign In      New User?  Sign Up
NFL News

NFL Football Teams

    • AFC-East

    • AFC-North

    • AFC-South

    • AFC-West

    • NFC-East

    • NFC-North

    • NFC-South

    • NFC-West

Buffalo Bills Football News

No. 3 role should suit Bills WR Reed well

Monday, May 05, 2008 | Posted by Connor Byrne

Let's face it, the Buffalo Bills used their second-round pick on wide receiver James Hardy in last month's NFL draft because they expect him to step in and make an immediate impact as a prominent member of their offense. Assuming the 6-foot-5, 217-pounder from the University of Indiana is the team's No. 2 wideout this season -- and there's no reason he shouldn't be -- that would bump incumbent starter Josh Reed back into the slot, where his career began.

Whenever the Bills have started Reed since he began his pro football-playing days in 2002 as a second-rounder from LSU, he's been out of his element. The 28-year-old won the Biletnikoff Award (given to the nation's top receiver) during his final year with the Bayou Bengals, so the expectations were understandably high when he entered the NFL. Obviously, however, Reed's performance hasn't met those expectations. Evidence of that lies in his numbers: During his six-season career, Reed has only 228 catches (good for under 40 per year) and a pathetic eight touchdown receptions (barely over one per season). Clearly, then, he hasn't been the explosive player Buffalo thought it was getting originally.

Nevertheless, Reed does serve a purpose. And back in the slot, where his career began so promisingly (37 grabs, 509 yards and two TDs as a rookie), Reed might be in position to succeed in 2008 and, for the first time since his inaugural campaign, avoid scrutiny from fans and media.

Given that the 5-10, 210-pounder -- who is Buffalo's best blocking receiver -- won't be expected to fill the role of a starter and take on opposing defenses' top two cornerbacks, odds are in his favor that he could serve as a reliable weapon to second-year quarterback Trent Edwards. It might even be fair to argue that Reed did that last season, when he hauled in 51 passes from J.P. Losman and Edwards -- a signal-caller unafraid to check down and find his targets via short and intermediate routes (which suits Reed). However, his 11.3 yards per catch and zero touchdowns were obviously unacceptable for a wideout who appeared in 15 games and was counted on as a starter for seven.

But, with Lee Evans and Hardy likely to start and handle the bulk of the receiving corp's major responsibilities, the pressure is no longer on Reed. At this point in his career, it's fair to say the Lafayette, La., native is never going to turn into the Hines Ward-type receiver many were hoping for. The big-play ability and sure-handedness simply aren't in Reed's repertoire. That doesn't mean he can't be of use as a No. 3, though, a position where he should be able to catch between 40 to 50 passes from Edwards in 2008 and supply Buffalo with another capable aerial weapon who can complement the better ones in front of him.

That should be the offense's hope, anyway, as Reed's days as a starter -- assuming Hardy performs the way he's capable of -- seem unofficially over. Whether they are or not, it's manifest the former college superstar doesn't have what it takes to be anything more than a serviceable role player on the big stage.

*E-mail: cbyrne@realfootball365.com
Please Login to Comment!   New user?  Sign Up!
Log In
Username Password

Forgot Your Password?



Auto-login on future visits
Show my name in the online users list

Avatar
One thing that has always impressed me of Reed is his toughness, after the catch he might have blazing speed but he is hard-nosed and lowers his shoulder and run through his would-be tacklers. He is exactly the type of receiver that can earn a living pounding guys in traffic over the middle. And by contrast, Roscoe is the complete opposite fast shifty and avoids contact out of preservation. Since the departure of EMO we haven't had the chance to use our #3 guy since we basically were without a #2. And even better is the fact that we now have Marshawn instead of board-hands McGahee so hopefully Turk will make good use of what he has to work with.

05/06  |  07:41 AM » Keysh67

Avatar
Your assessment of Reed is a little harsh and inconsistent. In one sentence 40 catches a year is not enough, in the next sentence 37 catches in his rookie season was promising. I do agree with you that Reed is ill suited to be a #2 receiver, mostly due to his size. Obviously Hardy has an edge in size over reed by about 7 inches.

The thing that you don't mention about Reed is that the majority of his receptions have gone for first downs. He has been a clutch receiver when he is used properly by the offensive coordinator. He is perfectly suited to be the number three receiver as he is solidly built, can take a hit up the middle, isn't afraid to make a catch in the thick of things etc. It's actually tougher to play the slot than to play the 1 and 2 spots. at 1 and 2 you need sure hands but more often than not you are expected to simply out run the defender to get open. These plays more often result in TD's so the top two receivers tend to get most of the press attention. However the slot receiver has to make a lot more tough catches in traffic and is typically hit hard immediately after the catch because of the routes he is running. Its a more demanding position in a lot of ways and one that a lot of receivers won't play. ocho cinco was practically crying when Buffalo laid the wood on him last season, he is clearly not cut out to play the slot. different players fit better in different roles. Clearly Reed is not suited for the 2nd receiver position, but Buffalo had no better options last season.

Also, Reeds numbers in 2007 were a reflection of the awful numbers on offense that the whole team shared. Nobody had respectable numbers in 2007. Still when I think of Reed I think of the spectacular plays he has made on rare occasions (like the one 2 years ago where he litterally bowled over 3 defenders on his way into the end zone). I think a return to the slot should mean a lot more of those plays and less ineffectiveness.

05/06  |  07:45 AM » Polish Lover

Avatar
Don't be shocked if Josh Reed is still the #2 receiver when the Bills open the season against the Seahawks. The transistion from college sensation to NFL starting receiver is not often immediate. Hopefully Hardy makes all the off-season workouts and gets signed and into camp on time so that he maximizes his opportunity to learn the offense. Even then learning the teams offense and how to adjust to opposing defenses takes time. Given the competition at the position you'd like to think Hardy starting from the first game is a given but I don't think it is.
If and when Hardy ascends to the #2 receiver role does Reed autmatically move to the #3 role or does that role remain with Roscoe Parish? In the slot Parish's explosiveness may outweight Reed's blocking ability as a #3 receiver. In fact if the team thinks Hardy is ready to start on September 7, Reed may not even make the final roster when you factor in his salary for a #4 receiver.

05/06  |  07:47 AM » Nate

Avatar
Reed, Parrish, Joe Blow whatever. We are one injury away to either Evans or Hardy before Reed becomes the #2 receiver again which is a very frightening thought.

05/06  |  08:00 AM » ddd

Avatar
Hardy will still have earn his way into the starters position, he might not start but will see plenty of action. I looked to see a lot of Parrish working the slot--it will be a mismatch if a safety tries to cover him.

Great bar moments from yesterdays posts--Buffalo is still a party town---still offers great live music and the food is fantastic. Now if the state can get industry to move back and remove dark the cloud that hovers over the city---I would think about moving back!!!

Here's a website that shows different aspects of Buffalo including some of the old BARS---

www.pbase.com/kjosker/buffalo_bars

05/06  |  08:03 AM » Goose

Avatar
Wow, you guys are being very nice to Reed this morning. So many people got on his a** very hard after he never really panned out as a legitimate 2nd option and he had his bout of the “drops” early on. I sometimes feel like people really like to stick up for him to try and make up for that (even though they shouldn’t).

I’ll give him credit that he has fixed his issues with hanging on to the ball and did have a knack for getting open for clutch first downs (although you could also make the argument that there were plenty of 3rd downs he didn’t get open for, thus contributing to our sub-par passing attack). That is where my compliments to him will stop.

He is, as the article mentioned, a “serviceable” 3rd receiver on his best day and more likely a solid 4th option. That is the best he’ll ever be. Since the team has neglected the position for so long and we don’t really have other options, my guess is he’ll be on the team another two seasons as a 3rd / 4th option. In that role he should be able to contribute. That is another byproduct of the Hardy pick-up and one of the reasons I really think our offense is going to be a lot better this year.

Oh, one other point, I don't see anyway that Hardy is not the 2nd reciever when we open the season. I know he has to "earn" the spot in training camp, but as bad as our other recievers are for the 2nd spot, I don't see anyway Hardy doesn't get it.

05/06  |  08:26 AM » RockesterinDC

Avatar
Reed's role this year as 2 or 3 doesn't matter just as long as he produces, and let's face it he not a 60-70 catch man. If we expect him to be that we're as dilutional as Donahoe.

05/06  |  08:29 AM » peterthedog

Avatar
The team will keep 6 receivers as they want to be able to go 4 wide at times. Theres no reason to cut any of their top guys especially considering the lack of depth at WR.

05/06  |  08:35 AM » Polish Lover

Avatar
ddd had a good point, any injury (especially to an unproven Hardy) could have Josh in the lineup again. Secondly, Reeds ability to hang on to the ball improved dramatically last year.

05/06  |  08:38 AM » moejoe01

Avatar
Reed's ypc were actually pretty good for a slot WR. He does have a knack for moving the chains. In a well functioning offense, which he has never been in, Reed can be a real contributor. Reed and Roscoe could both be on the field at times in a 4 WR set. He is a very good downfield blocker. Hardy may not be on the field for the Bills' very first offensive play from scrimmage. But then again it wouldn't surprise me if he was. He seems to be the most seasoned and pro-ready WR in the draft. Whitner had some very positive comments about Hardy and the impact he could have in 2008. After hearing a lengthy interview with Donte I would give his words some weight. He's got a high football IQ.

05/06  |  08:41 AM » Mike T.

RF365 Headlines Subscribe | Team Feed
© 2003-2008 realfootball365.com. All rights reserved.
REALFOOTBALL365 Inc. is not affiliated with the NFL or NFL Enterprises LLC. NFL and the NFL shield design are registered trademarks of the National Football League. The team names, logos and uniform designs are registered trademarks of the teams indicated. All other NFL-related trademarks are trademarks of the National Football League.
Page executed in 1.1746 seconds.